04.20.08

Love of Child

Posted in Orthodox Christianity, Parenting tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , at 9:04 am by AR

My Lad, II

I suppose that all natural human loves can be images of and partakers in Divine Love. It’s only just come to me how a parents’ love really does so.

In a happy marriage there is no need of a child to bring any completion or fulfil any lack within the relationship. The the man and the woman - diverse in sex, one in nature - have found unity and completion in one another, and they make a little world of themselves. Yet that same relationship will ordinarily flow out into living offspring. In fact, when parents bring a child into the world voluntarily and out of no obligation or sense of need, but just out of the desire to share their love with their own image, to allow their love to expand, as it were, and flow out, not only to an existing object, but to an object that exists because of the love that flows out to it - that is the when the phrase “Our Father, You Who are in Heaven” has the most meaning to us.

In case someone does not understand the comparison, I am talking about the truth that God is Himself a Realm and World that needs no other world to contain or give context. In diversity of Persons, Unity of Nature, His existance is named Love. Yet he pours out love even beyond himself, as impossible as this seems, which results in the existance of creatures and the bestowing of all good upon them. This is done freely and that is the beauty of it and the Honor of the Creator.

I believe that parental love is an image of this Divine Creative Love, and I think that the more freely parents bestow this ‘creating love’ upon the child whose existence they desire, the clearer the image becomes.

On the other hand, when the bearing of children becomes an obligation, as in so many corners of Christianity, the image is forbidden this, its most essential aspect.

Obligation is what ruins so many spiritual joys and godly virtues. I’m sure that is why, no matter how much the Jewish Christians of the Apostle Paul’s day were in need, no matter how good it was for the Gentiles to contribute largely to that need, he forbore to give them any command concerning the amount (or percentage) that each was to give. For “God loves a cheerful giver” and no one was to give “under compulsion.”

In fact, although the Kingdom of God is a place of order, of God’s rule, of Law of a sort, that Law is Love, and Love is free and is freedom. The whole tenor of true Christianity is one of goodness that is not under compulsion. Whenever I percieve the urge to codify and legislate what ought to be free and the springing up of grace, I feel that I am looking at something unhealthy and not fully Christian.

04.17.08

And Forgive Us Our Trespasses

Posted in Orthodox Christianity tagged , , , , , , , , at 9:43 am by AR

I used to think that to forgive someone was to release them from an obligation they had incurred against themselves by wronging me. Such a definition is easy to formulate and fits neatly into certain rather elegant theories about right and wrong. I suppose that idea still has some meaning or usefulness in some spheres of this life. However, I think that the more bewildering is more true: what is most important about forviveness is that we are all, already, under infinite obligation to one another because of that law which says, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”

I’m not saying that our obligation came into being when this law was first spoken as a commandement. The speaking of the command was, I think, more like a witness to a law that already existed because it has to do with what we are. As created beings, we are what we are only relative to other things that are and ultimately to the Uncreated, if we can be said to be anything relative to the Uncreated.

What I am trying to say is that when I forgive my neighbor I am the one under obligation, to suffer wrong rather than to wrong. This is to fulfill the law of Christ, which is love. If my baby, for whom I have cultivated limitless love, becomes angry with me for some baby reason, I would rather he changed his mind and came running into my arms, even if he pulls my hair and screams at me for a few moments, than that he flee from me in order to punish myself and nurture his greivance. I rejoice in the suffering of his rage if he vents it on me instead of on himself. It is better, if messier, than him giving me a dark look and retreating silently into loneliness.

When we ask God to forgive us, there is no obligation on his part. It is improper, I believe, to think of obligation when we are speaking of the Uncreated. Likewise, I don’t think we are asking for something to take place within God. I think we are asking that something be enabled to enter us. The forgiveness actually cures the sin. It absolves it, cleanses us from it, burns it, shames it into nothing. The forgiveness is more real than the sin.

My husband spent some minutes lately looking into an icon. When he returned he told me that sin doesn’t matter. That is a terrifying thing to hear from one’s husband. You think it means he’s going to sin more. Actually, acting as if sin doesn’t matter relative to one’s own pleasure is what is so dangerous. But when you say that sin is ultimately meaningless and nothing after gazing on God, that is a wholly different meaning. I’m not sure how to say what my husband told me, I’m not sure how he even told me. But it’s true. In the Light of God, there is no darkness. Sin is not the defining thing about me there. It vanishes.

This leads me to ask if whether, when we forgive our neighbor, there is not something of this grace that enters them even through us. If we merely release them from an obligation, probably not. In that case the consciousness of the unpaid debt remains forever. But perhaps if forgiveness even between creatures is of another kind - perhaps if it is the opening of my heart to their good, releasing the wrong they have done me and allowing it to vanish as my own sins do when God forgives me - perhaps then they feel some of the same health. I think what I am saying is that true forgiveness is when I see someone else in the light of God’s face. My sins, and their sins alike, are nothing there, and we are only what God has made us to be, the mysterious me and the unique him. And when I do that, maybe the person I have forgiven can know themselves a little as I have know them in that place.

All this sheds some light on a question I have long had - why we must ask God to forgive us as we forgive others. Doesn’t our forgiveness of others proceed from God’s forgiveness of us?

I still think that is true. Nevertheless, refusing to forgive others can lead to God not forgiving us. Stop. Think. Remember that in asking God to forgive us we are not asking for something to happen within God. How could we even think about such a thing? Likewise, when Christ says that God does not forgive us - either for blaspheming the Holy Spirit, or less permanantly, for refusing to forgive others, he is not talking about something that moves or changes withing God.

When I go into God’s light to have my sins washed away, when I seek to know the cleansing power of His Blood; I will see myself without my sins and I will see others in the same way. His light is infinite. It will not settle on me and close others out, no matter how much I may want it to. Either I will know forgiveness - the forgiveness that encompasses me and my bitterest enemy alike - or I will refuse forgiveness. Whether I refuse it for myself or others, I will shut myself out from it just the same.

Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us.

04.14.08

Poem XIV

Posted in Poems tagged , , , , , at 1:06 pm by AR

I

White wine wonders
red wine knows
(give me Blue for the morning rose)

Fly down, Angel
with your steel nose
plant
steel
seeds
in stuttering rows.

(The democrat hardly knows
what is going when it goes.)

II

To your parents, Last,
but your sons call you First;
First of your kind,
the tall, gray, Cursed,
Son of Machine
and Ungodly Thirst:

Of whom, pray, will the Judge demand:
Why did this boy die of thirst?

White Wind wanders
Red Poppy grows
And Blue Lords topple in helpless rows.

04.07.08

The Gods, Face to Face

Posted in Literature tagged , , , , at 11:06 pm by AR

Today I finished reading C. S. Lewis’ Till We Have Faces. I first read it a few years ago and was almost completely bewildered by it. Yet I have no doubt it helped make me Orthodox.  Now it provides endless material for cogent, deep thought.

It’s funny. You don’t really understand something; but it makes you more Orthodox. Then you become Orthodox, and you go back and the thing begins to make sense.

Till We Have Faces is food for tears.

I think it contains clues, or start-up ideas, for the answers to all the important questions, only a few of which I will inadequately mention.

First of all, the holy Mr. Lewis provides a few antitheses for our benefit. First, and most obviously, there is the antithesis between true love of one’s own soul vs. a possessive love of one’s own soul. Then, true desire to be made divine in union with God, vs. a foolish, proud desire to be made divine as mere arrogation. And, finally, the true sacrifice which God requires of human beings - that he may have them all so that they may be fitted to have Him - contrasted with the terror and ugliness of the ravening appetite of death and our constant confusions between the two. This last contrast leads deeps into winding ways in which death and appetite actually become ways and means for life and love…but I will not speak further of what I barely grasp, if at all, myself.

Making distinctions is an important art. It’s one door to understanding.

I think Mr. Lewis shows us things far more mysterious as well, which I struggle to paraphrase. Why did the human fall happen at all? If we insist on asking the question as a why, there’s no answer unless it is the face of the Lord. But if you learn to ask the question a little differently - what is the meaning of it, for instance, he seems to have some things to say.

Apparently for him, as for other orthodox thinkers, the story of mankind’s salvation is not merely one of a height, a fall, then a return to that same height. In the story, Psyche undergoes the same journey she would have had she not turned on the light too soon. Mankind follows the same basic path to God’s Purpose as we would have had we not eaten of that tree of moral knowledge too soon. Now the journey goes down deeper before it rises to the originally intended heights. But still the soul (Psyche) starts out mortal, and is eventually “godded” - yes, Mr. Lewis uses that very word - through a journey in which she has nothing to do really but confirm her love to her god through obedience. The outward or reasoning or self-conscious ”I” - as I interpret Orual - now suffers tortures of confusion and loss and anguish. But even that is saved through a mysterious, usually unconscious interchange of duties and motives between the steady, unswerving Psyche and the anguished self.

Finally, some words here lead me to contemplate once again the series of ideas by which we are led to think about our relationship to God.

At first one thinks that God is implacable. He is like a stone that cannot be moved or entreated or petitioned. He is wholly Other, wholly dangerous, wholly a source of destruction and loss.

Then one recieves like a child the saying that God repents the evil he means to do to man, and that when man himself repents of his own evil, God returns to him. When we draw near to God, God reciprocates by drawing near to us, we are told, and we learn to trust the saying. When we run from him he is angry and punishes us - perhaps forever, we hear.

But you cannot stay there forever. For it is necessary to return to the knowledge that God is changless, passionless.

At some point it strikes you that the same Will says yes or no to you depending on what you ask of it.  The same Food is lovely or hateful depending on what you can stomach. The same God is good to all - that is the deepest truth (unless you want to go deeper and say that God is beyond even good.) Ranged beneath that are the truths that we receive reward or punishment, praise or blame from God as we ourselves are worthy or unworthy. But prove him - probe the boundless with all humility - and the light dawns clearer and clearer that he is with you when you know him not, that everything is God’s mercy.

This is the point at which you want to go and write hymns to Christ - or at least to study the art of hymnwriting.

A Rather Quirky Story About A Vicious Rooster, In Which I Poke A Bit of Fun at My Own Kind

Posted in Stories tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , at 10:37 pm by AR

It’s not worth telling this story unless everyone understands what a very Normal family we are. We always have been normal, and we like it that way. That’s why we can’t stand the people across the street, who are not Normal at all.

That said, this story is about the evil and ferocious rooster that once inhabited our basement.

A few summers ago my parents took a three-week trip together, just for fun.

After a lot of discussing, they left my brother and me in charge of our house, because my brother had just turned 16 and they figured we could handle it. I was 15.

When the car was all loaded with my parent’s luggage and they were about to walk out the door, my mother looked at us with a frown and told us to call the lady across the street if there was trouble. My brother said we wouldn’t have to, because if there was trouble, the lady across the street would know about it before we did. Mom said that wasn’t a nice thing to say. I guess it wasn’t nice, but it was normal.

That was on a Friday. Monday morning, I was hanging out laundry on the rusty old clothesline my Mom used to use when we were younger. The clothes dryer stopped working the day after Mom and Dad left. It was very early, because I wanted to get it done before anyone saw me doing something so abnormal for a girl my age in that neighborhood. I was just pinning up my sheet when the Lady-Across-The-Street popped up over the clothesline.

“Michelle,” she said, and she sort of pinched her face all up and looked at me over the rim of her cat-eye glasses, “are you aware that A Rooster now resides in your basement?”

I didn’t know what to say, so I repeated some of her words, “rooster in our basement?”

“Woke me up this morning, with its blamed singing” she said, whipping off her cat-eye glasses and cleaning them as she spoke. I felt intimidated for a moment but then I remembered who I was, and who she was, and - well, I threw the last towel over the line and spoke plainly.

“You’re seriously admitting that there’s a rooster in my house, it woke you up - but I didn’t even hear it?”

She stopped wiping and looked at me in disgust.

“OK, whatever. I’ll look for it when I go in,” I said.

“It’ll attack you, I’m certain. You don’t exactly have a way with animals.”

“My cat adored me. Before it died.”

“Your rooster won’t. Your rooster is probably a vicious old thing with a battled-scarred comb. Your rooster is probably ugly, and mean, and stupid too. I hate your rooster.”

“Well, I don’t like when people talk about my rooster that way.”

She put her glasses back on and we glared at one another for a few seconds, and then she said, “Tell him ‘Hi’ for me.”

“I will” I said, and we went back into our houses.

Andy was sleeping on the floor in front of the TV. I shoved him with my toe, and he tripped me, but I don’t think he really woke up until I told him that we had a visitor in the basement.

He sat up, then, and said, “Male or female?”

“Um, male, I think.”

“The cool look…” he muttered, and went to the mirror. The clothes that he had slept in on the floor already had the cool look, once he turned the shirt inside out. I waited until he was done, because I didn’t know if I was afraid of roosters or not, and I didn’t want to find out unless someone big and strong was there.

“Go ahead” I said, and Andy sauntered to the top of the basement steps.
He stopped, and looked at me, coming up behind him. “You’re sure he’s in the basement?” my brother asked, suddenly realizing how abnormal that was.

I told him that it was some creature that seemed to be the sworn enemy of the Lady-Across-The-Street.

“Wow” Andy said, with a look of awe on his face. “Probably an angel or something, huh?”

We walked down the steps, looking this way and that. We didn’t see anything. “She swore he was down here” I began babbling. “Maybe I shouldn’t have listened, but…”

Suddenly this whirring noise startled me. Then a scrawny, rust-red bird about the size of a gallon water pitcher shot down from the ceiling. It landed on Andy’s head. Andy was screaming and flailing his arms around and the rooster was beating his wings and pecking at my brother’s head.

The rooster was small and vicious.

I was just screaming at first, but eventually I noticed a thin board of plywood leaning against the wall next to me, so I grabbed it and whacked the rooster across the room.

Andy whipped his head around and gave me a wild look. But he didn’t have time to decided whether to yell at me for almost taking his head off or thank me for saving him. The rooster, on the other side of the basement floor, got up and began beating his wings savagely. His neck was arched, and these long little feathers sloping down from his head all around his neck were puffed out. Like a ball gown. Only more like one of those collars you see on mean dogs, with spikes on them.

I could tell the rooster wanted to do something bad to us, because he was glaring at us with the most evil round little eyes. You notice such weird stuff at a moment like that, and I have to say that his eyes were cold, and yellow, and strangely ribbed. As if they were made of the same stuff as a tongue or a scab.

Then he was scrabbling across the cement floor, straight at us.

We saw him coming, and went for the stairs.

Now, when we were younger, Andy and I used to believe, or play at believing, that goblins lived in the basement. Whenever we had to go down there in those days, we came up again as soon and as quickly as we could.

It had been awhile, but we both found we could still make pretty good time.
After we had slammed the door and caught up on some breathing, I wanted Andy to call someone to come and shoot the bird and he said that Tyler’s Dad had a gun.

So Andy called Tyler, who was 19, and I called Tyler’s sister Ruthie and our cousin Jon because I had to tell someone and it drove me nuts that Jon got to tell Tyler. And they all came over.

I was looking out the window when they drove up - Jon got out of his car and saw Tyler on the sidewalk with his gun, loading it. He ran up and they messed with the gun for a minute. Ruthie came in and hugged me and said she hoped she would not have to look at the rooster after her brother killed it.

Then Tyler and Jon came in, all riled up about the rooster, and asking where it was. We told them the whole story and the guys started making fun of Andy for running away from “a puny little bird”.

He was trying to defend himself, but wasn’t doing a very good job. Now I hope no one will think it is abnormal if I mention that I am a little bit loyal to my family and when people make fun of Us I like to defend whichever member of Us needs it.

So I asked the boys if they wouldn’t they like to meet the “puny little bird.” Without the gun.

And this is when it started to get really uncanny, which is a word I remember from vocabulary tests at school. This is where it started to seem like that rooster understood more than was Normal for a bird.

It was almost funny the way the rooster dealt with Tyler, who was really pretty conceited, as we all remembered pretty soon. Tyler accepted my invitation, and walked down the basement stairs, boasting and making fun of Andy all the way down.

The rooster toyed with him by not making a sound or showing himself at all. Tyler stopped at the bottom of the stairs and looked around. He rustled up some nerve and started poking about. Eventually he searched the whole basement. The rest of us stood on the stairs and kept watch.

Finally we were all convinced that the rooster had disappeared. Tyler began marching up the stairs, bragging even more. And that made it very eerie when a loud triumphant crow sounded from above and began repeating itself almost monotonously.

It was so unexpected that at the first head-splitting bird-screech, Tyler came leaping back up the stairs toward us and safety, and landed chest-first on the kitchen floor, hands sprawling everywhere, boasts all forgotten. (I almost smiled until I remembered whose side I was on.)

We slammed the door and exclaimed over the thing for a while, and then I looked to our cousin Jon, who was obviously thinking hard.

“I think the way you have to deal with these creatures is with your feet. We’re taller than them, that’s our advantage. I bet if I get out in the middle of the floor, make him show himself, I can kick him clear across the room before he ever gets anywhere near me.” We all nodded hopefully, except Tyler who was coughing and muttering something about being sick a couple of days ago. With a cold.

Jon said to wish him luck, then he ran lightly down the stairs, heading for the center of the room. This time the rooster didn’t even make a sound. It just flew between his feet on the last couple of steps. Jon tripped. And landed on his front.

And you know what was really freaky? I swear that bird just stood there and kicked at Jon’s head. (He only did it in spite; he couldn’t kick worth anything.)

Jon let out a horrific scream, tore the rooster out of his hair, and hurled him across the room. Then he came bounding up the stairs and collapsed on the tile kitchen floor. Andy slammed the door.

We gathered around him and Ruthie flung herself down on her knees next to Jon. She kept saying, “Oh, Jon!”

Jon grabbed my brother’s arm and pulled himself up. He panted a minute, looking at us really weird the whole time, and then he said something that totally freaked us out.

“That rooster” he gasped, “that rooster KNOWS!” It was like a movie.

Like I said, we were really freaked out, but after awhile everyone calmed down so we started eating. Jon looked happier and mentioned that his cold was getting better but he was supposed to be eating and getting his strength back.

We were discussing the whole thing (I remember everyone’s voices being kind of giddy) and we all agreed that the bird reminded us of the Phantom of the Opera, who lived down in the secret caverns and tried to kill people and stuff. So we started calling the rooster “Erik” (which is the Phantom’s name in the book.)

Pretty soon the guys went to the park down the next street to see some tadpoles in the pond, and Ruthie and I locked the basement door and cleaned up lunch and swore we would never marry.

When the guys came back, they were talking about the rooster (Erik,) and they were full of new plans for getting rid of him but a little nervous.

This is how guys work up their courage - they dare and dare and dare each other until their pride drags their courage to the top.

Anyway, the three boys decided to brave the basement again, this time as a group. They’d bought a net from a pre-adolescent they met in the park and meant to snare Erick with it somehow. Ruthie was supposed to hold the door open for them and close it in time if they had to come up quickly. I was told to stand a few feet back with the phone and call 911 on speed-dial if anything happened. Andy emphasized the speed-dial part, and even took the time to re-program it as number 1 in case I forgot and had to start working my way through the numbers.

So the three guys were kind of shuffling towards the stairs with that net under a big sweatshirt of my Dad’s, still throwing out a few encouraging dares and insults along the way. Ruthie stood in the stairwell and I watched a little further back.

And before the got past the first step the door bell clanged.

We all jumped.

Then we slammed the basement door, turned around, and walked to the front hall very quickly. (Ruthie positively scuttled but don’t tell her I said so.)

I opened the door and there was the Lady-Across-The-Street, standing on our door-stoop! Her head was hanging down and tears slipped out of her half-closed eyelids. The guys stood behind me in the hallway and stared at her.

“It’s the Lady-Across-The-Street” my brother whispered to Ruthie. “She’s not Normal.”

The lady cleared her throat. “Can I see him?” she said in a breaking voice. She wasn’t wearing her cat-eye glasses.

After an awkward silence I told her I guessed so. She pushed through us immediately, still crying, and we all followed her to the basement stairs. She went through it and shut it in our faces. We heard her walking down the stairs.

“I wonder what happens when two of - their kind - meet” my brother said. The other guys nodded.

After a long moment of silence we heard two voices screaming very loudly. Ruthie looked horrified. We couldn’t tell which voice belonged to the lady and which to the bird.

About ten seconds later the basement door flew open and the lady burst out of it. “You can’t tell that bird anything!” she shrieked, and stomped out of the house. She had her cat-eye glasses back on.

We stared at the basement door for a long time and didn’t say anything. We had very little enthusiasm left for the project we’d started.

Finally I reminded the guys that they were going to catch Eric with a net.

They fidgeted a lot but finally grabbed the net and shuffled off.

This time Eric was positively foul. He sprang upon the guys halfway down the stairs and started tearing at the backs of their legs with his hard beak. In case you don’t know, a rooster’s beak is like an upside down horn. It’s a weapon. And the guys were all wearing shorts. Ruthie screamed like an opera singer.

Well, that did it.

Hollering and stumbling and flailing, the guys came up for the last time. Ruthie wasn’t screaming anymore but she didn’t remember her job, either, so I slammed the basement door for her.

Then we heard Ruthie exhaling hoarsely behind the door, so we opened it again and dragged her out, and then shut it once more.

She drew a round, gasping breath like someone coming up out of the water after almost drowning. Then she wailed, “I couldn’t scream! Tyler, take me home!”

“Uh, guys, I have to take my sister home” Tyler said.

We didn’t push him to stay. We didn’t want to stay in the same house with Erik ourselves.

Jon was fidgety and even suggested that we stay with the people across the street, but then we told him to look out the window and he saw them all sitting motionless on the front porch perspiring in the sun (the porch didn’t have a roof.) So he invited us to spend the night at his place instead, and that is how our exile began.

We left Erik in the house and locked the doors, taking all the clean laundry with us.

We started making the rounds, staying overnight at classmates’ and relatives’ houses. The story of the “demonic firebird” was getting around to all our friends, and we got lots of invites. (I found that dramatizing the wording a little would increase the number of invites, and I was getting to be the most popular girl in my grade.)

Then, one night, Andy and I had to go home to get Andy’s baseball uniform, which was in the laundry. We ventured down into the basement, hoping against hope that the bird was gone somehow, or that we could at least grab his uniform before we were driven back upstairs. I carried Andy’s bat.

But this time we weren’t attacked.

Andy said, “Listen…” and we stood motionless in front of the wash-machine and listened. All we heard was a soft gurgly squawking. Andy whispered, “Maybe he’s dying.”

“I wonder if we injured him and never realized it” I said.

In the end we shrugged and went back to Ian’s house. But our fear was broken.

The next night, I slept in my own bedroom.

Dad and Mom were coming home on a Saturday afternoon, and we got up early on Saturday morning to do all the things that they had left for us to do. When they drove up, the house was clean, the lawn was sort of raked, there were fewer weeds in the root-garden, and all the dirty laundry was under Andy’s bed.

They hugged us and stuff, and we carried their things inside.

“You know,” said Mom, “the house smells kind of funny . . .”

Like a dingbat, Andy said, “There’s a rooster who’s probably dead in the basement.”

I glared at him. He shouldn’t have told. He should have waited for Dad to find Erik’s remains, and get wondering what in the world they were there for, and throw them out. If we got in a conversation, on the other hand, there’s no telling what they might take it into their heads to blame us for.

But Mom was already staring at us like “no way.” Any normal mother would.
I tried to laugh and said, “It’s probably just the bit of dirty laundry under Andy’s bed.”

Andy caught on, and said, “Oh yeah, that laundry. I meant to get to it but…”

However Dad interrupted and said, “What’s this about a rooster?”

So we had to tell him. And in the end it wasn’t so bad. There was a smell but we had kept the basement windows open and all the house fans were down there and there were rolled-up towels (line-dried) in front of the crack at the bottom of the basement door. Mom and Dad were glad we had at least prevented the smell from spreading too much, and they felt sorry for us because, as I heard Mom whispering to Dad, we weren’t really used to dealing with Death.

But we all had to go down together to get Erik’s remains because Dad whispered back that it was about time we started to get used to it. Mom cried when we found Erik shriveled up behind the ironing board, his feathers being ruffled by the flow from an air-conditioning vent. She said, “Oh, the poor thing!”

I didn’t feel sorry for him.

Dad scooped him into a clear plastic bag with a little plastic beach-shovel or something and we all marched outside to bury him behind the compost pile.

That’s not the end. The Lady-Across-The-Street came over while we were burying the rooster.

Her face was white, and her glasses were nowhere to be seen. She knelt down between my astounded but polite-faced parents, opened the box the bird was in, and put on some white latex gloves like you see in the Dentist’s office. And she started pinching Erik’s breastbone. At first I thought that she was thinking about eating him. But she sat up again, abruptly.

“Horrible,” said the Lady. “He starved to death!” When the Lady said “starved” Mom gasped, and we all stood there looking at him.

“What an awful way to go” Mom said softly.

“He tried to murder us,” I explained, “We really couldn’t have fed him.” But my voice sounded too loud just then and no one wanted to curse the dead.

“Himself his own destruction.” Mom said. “It’s so pathetic - almost human.”

We covered that ugly bird-body with dirt and didn’t say anything more, and then my parents went into the house. My Dad had his arm around his wife’s waist. And then Andy and I realized we were alone with the Lady-Across-The-Street.

She was standing over the grave, sobbing. We looked over at her, and my brother’s eyes were all big.

Andy coughed sort of, and then he said, “uh, you must have known him well…or…something…” But she sobbed on and he looked at me like he felt really stupid.

“It wasn’t even a person!” he whispered.

“He was my rooster, once upon a time,” the Lady said, suddenly and coldly.

(Andy looked at me sideways, with a guilty kind of look.)

“You hated him, didn’t you?” she continued.

Andy looked at me again, quite helplessly.

So I said to the Lady-Across-The-Street, “We weren’t friends exactly.”

She was furious. But Andy and I couldn’t help it if she belonged in an asylum. So we just walked away, across the lawn, with the wind cooling our faces off and long green shadows and golden streaks going with us and laying along the ground between our half-grown trees. I remember the scene distinctly, because about halfway across the lawn, we heard the Lady-Across-The-Street screeching after us.

“Everything has to feed! He was just trying to eat you!”

She wasn’t Normal, and we were. Andy and I kept walking.

04.05.08

Of Men, Measures, and Morals

Posted in Christianity, Soul's Knowledge, Trail of Delight tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , at 7:52 pm by AR

By God’s creative purpose, a human being is an inveterate appraiser. Without our intent, without choice, we are people who go about saying “good” and “not good.” Whatever we look at, whether an object or a situation, whether external to us or appearing within our minds, we automatically measure it against some internal standard. 

Popular culture would define this standard as one of “right vs. wrong.” Increasingly, this system fails as less and less can be confidently classified as either.

I owe my understand of this internal standard to a long line of thinkers who say that Good is Beauty and Beauty is Good. (These two qualities, along with Truth, define one another, so that no one should claim that we are reducing Goodness to aesthetics.

Actually, the fact that conservative thought has always linked Good, Beauty, and Truth together as distinct but united in nature can be seen as a secret revelation of the Trinity. For “none is Good but God,” and we know the Father by this Name. But Christ the Word is Truth - “Thy Word is Truth” - for he reveals the Father and expressly images his person. And the Holy Spirit is indeed like Beauty, for he ravishes everyone to whom he appears, yet never appears in his own but in every object manifests his presence to those who can perceive him and influences even those who cannot.

But I must retreat from speaking of things the thought of which should stop my mouth and still my fingers.)

I think there is a general understanding that religious people should also be good people. But how long has it been since religious people seriously examined the questions: What makes a good person good?

I have an answer to start with. It’s in two parts.

1) A good person knows the difference between good and bad. When a good person looks at what is actually good he accurately judges it to be good. When he looks at something that is not good he perceives it as such. 

However, understanding that good shares a nature with beauty has implications not only for the nature of good but also for the nature of criticism. That is, discerning good and bad becomes a different process when we stop thinking of good as a particular point along a line of possibilities, and begin thinking of it as a quality, an inescapable yet elusive effusion of divine glory into created things.

When you understand what beauty is you can recognize it in a scene, a face, a phrase, a line of music, or a mathematical formula - even if you have never seen that particular thing before and been told that it qualifies as “right.” Good, beauty and truth - they have a flavor. Once learn the taste of them and you begin to recognize them in any of their endless manifestations.

Which brings us to the second thing that makes a good person good. When I say that a human being is an appraiser of good and bad, I am not saying that we are all equipped with a source of information about moral values. There is no virtue in having information.

2) Therefore a good person is one who actually prefers what is good.

I don’t think we should add up points 1 and 2 - as if someone could become good by first learning to discern and afterward disciplining himself to choose what is good. Rather the two define one another. How does someone reach the place at which his internal standard of beauty matches the objective reality of beauty? Only by loving beauty - valuing it enough to pursue it, casting aside all that hinders or falls short. Those who take pleasure in what is good are the ones who truly know its nature and recognize it wherever they see it. Likewise, those who see what is good are inclined toward it.

For human beings are not just appaisers. We are not like someone who knows the worth of a Vermeer in dollars or pounds but has no preferrence between a Vermeer and a canvass with some paint tossed at it. When we approve something we take joy or pleasure in it; when we long for something we also value it.  Both of these affections rise from one and the same motion of the heart. Deep within us is a spring from which the multitudinous streams of thought, feeling, action flow in our conscious lives. This spring involves our capacity to be inclined toward or against something. It is this power of inclination that enslaves us to sin and yeilds us to God - that makes us a moral agent. I believe it is also this power that lends us the potential for true freedom.

There is much more to be said on this subject. I mostly wanted to point out that one of our first duties as Christians is to prefer good to bad.

I also wanted to point out that learning to discern between the two is a necessary corollory to this duty.

Christians should like good things better than those things that are not good. It should be obvious. But how greviously have we declined not only to prefer good to bad but even to think about the difference between the two.

Yesterday I drove past a church built to resemble a movie theater. I was horrified. But I was nearly alone in my sentiment as other Christians around me couldn’t see the difficulty.

I won’t attempt to prove that the designers of this church did “wrong.” Such an attempt is beside the point, and it would be met with blank stares and protests about “personal opinion” anyway. 

I will say that to choose such a design instead of others that partake more of the Good, the True, and the Beautiful, is truly wicked. It is a preferrence for something less good over something more good.

Architecture is a language and this building lied about the nature of God and Religion. There was no truth in it. There was little beauty - none worthy the subject of the discourse. As for Good, it seems elusive but where truth and beauty are absent I think the inner revolt can be justified.

For along with the moral quality of ourselves comes the moral quality of all our works. Everything we do speaks a language and everything we say in those languages either praises God or blasphemes him - or else it does both at the same time, which is the worst yet.

Do the Church a great service. Sit down with those souls for whom you are responsible - yourself alone if that is all - and teach yourself how to understand the language of music. Or architechure. Or images. God save us when the church is made up of people who don’t know Good from bad and led by people telling those who do to check their personal preferences at the Church door.

In the spirit of this endeavour, and of Lent, I recommend Tavener’s “Lamentations and Praises” sung by Chanticleer. I’ve been listening to it nearly every day for a couple of weeks now. It’s not good background music. It’s a serious discourse that speaks directly to your affections about things sacred and mysterious. Because is has words it also works as a sort of Rosetta Stone if you are unfamiliar with this kind of music. Give it the time of day.

One of my original motives for seeking out the Orthodox Church is that it appears to be the final reserve of ancient Christian feeling and thought. Here that which is good, true, and beautiful are honored by those who attempt to hold them in trinity, no matter how many centuries of use they have already seen.

Still, I’m not just seeking to escape Western culture. I think many of the answers for our destruction could be found in the East. I will always be greived by the long decline of the inner life and its outward consequences suffered by my people, my language, my nation, my culture, my heritage.

I have no stout theories about the future of human civilization. Will there only be the Orthodox Church 1,000 years from now? Or will faith all but die? However I do know that in each generation it is the duty of true men and women to preserve, love, protect, and embrace what is good - whatever is beneficial to human life, whatever is transcendantly valuable above all uses and purposes. So I’m saying to my fellow Orthodox Christians: please, consider in quiet careful thought what has befallen our bretheren. They confess the same God as us, the same Christ, the same Holy Spirit, the same Incarnation. But they don’t care to make a difference between Church and Theatre.

Let us devote ourselves to the Love of our God. Let us love what is Good.